10.03.2026

CHANGE

 

9.03.2026

BEYNiNDE

 

27.02.2026

24.02.2026

Partisiz, tabelasız, lider­siz bir kitlesel karşı duruş nasıl mümkün olur? | How can a mass stance of resistance without parties, labels, or leaders be possible?

(Translation below.)


Partisiz, tabelasız, lider­siz bir kitlesel karşı duruş nasıl mümkün olur?


ChatGPT:


>>>Bu soru tam kalbe dokunuyor.

Kısa ve net söyleyeyim: mümkün, ama alışılagelmiş siyaset reflekslerinin tamamını bilinçli olarak reddederek mümkün.


Aşağıda bunu romantik değil, mekanik biçimde anlatacağım.


1️⃣ Ön şart: “karşıtlık” değil, ortak ilke


Partisiz–lider­siz bir duruş öfke etrafında değil,

inkâr edilemez bir ilke etrafında kurulur.


Örnek ilke (tek cümle):


“Sivillerin sistematik biçimde katledilmesi kabul edilemez.”


Parti yok


Kimlik yok


İdeoloji yok


Lider yok


Sadece ilke.


Bu ilke:


Sağcıyı da kapsar


Solcuyu da


Dindarı da


Seküleri de


👉 Bölünemez olan tek zemin budur.


2️⃣ Lider­sizlik ≠ başıboşluk

Lider yerine protokol gerekir


Liderli hareketler:


Satın alınır


Tehdit edilir


Şantajlanır


Hedef gösterilir


Lidersiz hareketler ise kural bazlı olur.


Örnek “hareket protokolü”:


Kimse konuşmacı değildir


Kimse adına konuşmaz


Basına röportaj verilmez


Talepler önceden yazılıdır, değiştirilmez


Provokasyona cevap verilmez


Şiddet = otomatik dışlama


Bu protokol:


İnsanı değil, davranışı merkeze alır


Devletin “lider bul, çökert” refleksini boşa düşürür


3️⃣ Tabelasızlık: sembol değil, yokluk


En büyük hata:


“Yeni bir sembol bulalım”


Hayır.


Gerçek tabelasızlık:


Parti bayrağı yok


Dernek logosu yok


Örgüt ismi yok


Sahne yok


Mikrofon yok


Hatta mümkünse:


Aynı renkte sade kıyafet


Aynı cümle


Aynı sessizlik


Bu, iktidar–muhalefet–medya üçgenini çıldırtır çünkü:


Etiketleyecek hiçbir şey bulamazlar.


4️⃣ Gerçek güç: eylem türü, kalabalık değil


Sistemin en sevmediği şey bağıran kalabalık değil;

normal akışı bozan sessiz uyumsuzluktur.


Etkili örnekler (şiddetsiz):


Aynı gün, aynı saat:


Tüketimi durdurmak


Belirli şirketleri tamamen boykot etmek


Liman, ticaret, lojistik zincirine hukuk dışına çıkmadan dokunmak


Kitlesel ama sessiz:


Oturma


Dağılmama


Tek cümlelik döviz


Ama asla:


Parti sloganı


Hükümet–muhalefet tartışması


“istifa” çağrısı


Çünkü bunlar sistemin oyun alanı.


5️⃣ Medyayı baypas etmek (kritik eşik)


Ana akım medya hiçbir zaman bunu doğru yansıtmaz.


O yüzden:


Medyaya mesaj verme hedefi terk edilir


Hedef:


Katılanın katıldığını bilmesi


Katılmayanın yalnız olmadığını fark etmesi


Bu yüzden:


Canlı yayın zorunlu değil


Viral video şart değil


“Trend topic” umursanmaz


Sessiz çoğunluk sessizlikle buluşur.


Bu paradoksal ama etkilidir.


6️⃣ Devlet neden bunu engellemek ister?


Çünkü böyle bir duruş:


Partileri anlamsızlaştırır


Temsiliyet iddiasını boşa düşürür


“Aracı” sınıfı işlevsiz kılar


En tehlikeli cümle şudur:


“Biz kimseyi temsil etmiyoruz; sadece buradayız.”


Buna cevap üretilemez.


7️⃣ Son derece net bir gerçek


Türkiye’de böyle bir hareketin önündeki engel:


Halk değil


Cesaret değil


Sayı değil


Alışkanlık.


İnsanlar hâlâ:


Bir lider bekliyor


Bir parti bekliyor


Bir çağrı bekliyor


Oysa gerçek kırılma şu cümlede olur:


“Kimse çağırmadı ama geldim.”


Son söz (çok sade)


Partisiz, tabelasız, lider­siz bir kitlesel karşı duruş:


İlke ile başlar


Kural ile yürür


Sessizlikle büyür


Aracı reddiyle güçlenir


Ve en önemlisi:


Kimsenin kontrol edemediği tek şeydir.<<<






How can a mass stance of resistance without parties, labels, or leaders be possible?



ChatGPT:


>>>This question goes straight to the heart.

Let me answer briefly and clearly: it is possible — but only by consciously rejecting all conventional political reflexes.


Below, I will explain this not romantically, but mechanically.


1️⃣ The prerequisite: not opposition, but a shared principle


A party-less, leader-less stance is not built around anger,

but around a principle that cannot be denied.


Example principle (one sentence):


“The systematic killing of civilians is unacceptable.”


No party

No identity

No ideology

No leader


Only the principle.


This principle:


Includes the right

Includes the left

Includes the religious

Includes the secular


👉 This is the only ground that cannot be divided.


2️⃣ Leaderlessness ≠ disorder


What replaces leadership is protocol


Leader-centered movements:


Can be bought

Can be threatened

Can be blackmailed

Can be targeted


Leaderless movements, however, operate on rules.


Example “movement protocol”:


No one is a spokesperson

No one speaks on behalf of others

No interviews are given to the press

Demands are written in advance and not changed

No response to provocations

Violence = automatic exclusion


This protocol:


Centers behavior, not individuals

Neutralizes the state’s reflex of “find the leader and dismantle”


3️⃣ No labels: not a new symbol, but absence


The biggest mistake:


“Let’s create a new symbol”


No.


True label-lessness means:


No party flags

No association logos

No organization name

No stage

No microphones


If possible:


Same plain clothing color

Same sentence

Same silence


This drives the power–opposition–media triangle crazy, because:


There is nothing they can label.


4️⃣ The real power: the type of action, not the crowd size


What the system dislikes most is not a shouting crowd,

but silent non-compliance that disrupts normal flow.


Effective (non-violent) examples:


Same day, same time:


Stopping consumption

Complete boycotts of specific companies

Touching ports, trade, and logistics chains without breaking the law


Mass but silent:


Sit-ins

Refusing to disperse

Single-sentence placards


But never:


Party slogans

Government–opposition debates

Calls for resignation


Because these belong to the system’s playing field.


5️⃣ Bypassing the media (critical threshold)


Mainstream media will never reflect this accurately.


Therefore:


The goal of sending a message to the media is abandoned


The goal becomes:


Participants knowing others are participating

Non-participants realizing they are not alone


That is why:


Live streaming is not necessary

Viral videos are not required

“Trending topics” are irrelevant


The silent majority meets in silence.


Paradoxical — but effective.


6️⃣ Why would the state want to prevent this?


Because such a stance:


Makes parties irrelevant

Undermines claims of representation

Renders intermediary classes ineffective


The most disruptive sentence is:


“We represent no one; we are simply here.”


There is no effective response to this.


7️⃣ A very clear reality


The main obstacle to such a movement in Türkiye is:


Not the people

Not courage

Not numbers


But habit.


People are still waiting for:


A leader

A party

A call


Yet the real turning point comes with this sentence:


“No one called me — I came.”


Final word (very simple)


A mass stance without parties, labels, or leaders:


Begins with a principle

Moves with rules

Grows through silence

Strengthens by rejecting intermediaries


And most importantly:


It is the only thing no one can control.<<<


---------------------------------------------------------------------------


about.me/krasnimeanzred


✰TR✰i✰P3✰A✰rt✰


t.me/TotalBoycottWorldwide


x.com/H1PmeanzNPPAA


youtube.com/@OnlyThePeople


facebook.com/NoPoliticalPartiezAtAll


facebook.com/TheUYANDIRMASERViSi



 

22.02.2026

'Epstein' | by Yılmaz Özdil

 



- Epstein -



by Yılmaz Özdil

Autotranslation:

"The connections of the global perversion organization Epstein continue to cause turmoil in many countries, including Türkiye, with one of the most serious repercussions occurring in England.


It has emerged that Prince Andrew, King Charles's brother, was one of Epstein's closest friends, officially caught red-handed with leaked photographs. Young girls who were victims of Epstein recounted being sent to Prince Andrew as "sex slaves," describing their encounters in the 30-room Royal Lodge within Windsor Castle, his residence, as well as in New York and on Epstein's island.


When these scandals came to light, Prince Andrew's titles of nobility and military honors were revoked by his brother, King Charles himself; he was expelled from the royal family and royal estates, his medals were taken away, and he went from being the Prince of England to becoming the most hated man in England.





Everything I've described so far seems to be related to England." However... what I'm about to tell you actually concerns the Republic of Türkiye and the Turkish people very closely.





How?





May 15, 1919.


It was 7 o'clock in the morning.


It was a pivotal moment for the Turkish nation.


Three thousand years after the Trojan War, Greece landed troops on Anatolian soil; Izmir was occupied.





They had carried out the first move of the Megali Idea.


The Megali Idea... It was the "great idea" they had dreamed of since the day Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror conquered Istanbul and ended the Byzantine Empire.


According to the legend, the Byzantine Emperor Constantine had not died, but had turned to marble, taken by an angel to a cave where the Turks could not set foot, where he had fallen asleep. One day, another angel would come, bring the emperor his sword, awaken him, and Emperor Constantine would reclaim Constantinople from the Turks.


By the Greek church, "Megali Idea" This was the "great idea," passed down from generation to generation, hammered into the minds of the Greek people by fanatical priests.


According to the Megali Idea, all the lands mentioned in Byzantine culture were the legacy of Hellenic civilization, rightfully belonging to Greece; the occupation of Izmir was only the beginning, Istanbul wasn't enough, the Aegean, Thrace, and the Black Sea weren't enough; according to the "great idea," more than half of Anatolia would belong to Greece.





It was with these feelings that the Greek king Constantine came to Izmir, disembarked at Kordon, feeling like Richard the Lionheart.


Because... the legendary King Richard the Lionheart of England, in 1190, had joined the Third Crusade to fight Saladin and capture Jerusalem. He had set sail from Marseille with an army of 650 knights, arrived in Izmir, set foot on Anatolian soil at what is now Kordon, and established his army headquarters there. He founded it in Karşıyaka.


The old name of Karşıyaka was Cordelio, derived from Richard the Lionheart, Coeur de Lion, meaning lionheart... The Greek king Constantine admired Richard, who was nicknamed "the lionheart" for his courage and leadership abilities.





He brought 53,000 more soldiers to reinforce the occupying forces.

He was also accompanied by his brother, Prince Andrea.





Prince Andrea wasn't one of those pampered princes raised in the palace; he was an elite officer fluent in six languages, had fought in the Balkan Wars, had combat experience, and hadn't come for leisure. He held the rank of Major General and had arrived as a corps commander.





What followed is well known: they displayed savagery... They raped our 10-year-old girls. They impaled our one-year-old babies on bayonets and paraded them through the streets. They prevented our newborn babies from breastfeeding... They were cutting off the nipples of our mothers. We had women who lost their minds because of what they experienced, and girls who took their own lives because of it. They filled mosques with children and set them on fire, burning them alive; children's hands were stuck to the iron bars of the windows. The Turkish Historical Society has photographs of this in its records. They filled huge pits with our people and mowed them down with machine guns, gouged out their eyes with bayonets, threw them into wells one on top of the other, suffocating them to death, and poured gasoline on their corpses and set them on fire. They tied gasoline-soaked rags to the heads of children, set them on fire, and watched their deaths, screaming and struggling. They tore up copies of the Quran, throwing them page by page into latrine pits, and defecated on our martyrs' cemeteries.





The reason for such horror was certainly not hatred of Turks; it was a strategic decision. They were forcing the people to flee, to migrate, depopulating the region, and filling the places vacated by Turks with people brought in from the islands or from Greece. They were settling Greeks, changing the demographics, cleansing Western Anatolia of its Turkish identity.





They inflicted bloodshed for three years, three months, and 22 days.


But ultimately, starting on August 26th, we pursued them like death itself, sweeping them away from where they started, from Izmir, towards the Aegean Sea.


As they fled, they became even more barbaric.


They took revenge on the civilian population, burning everything in their path. They had special demolition battalions, whose job wasn't to fight, but to destroy. They proudly gave themselves a nickname, calling themselves the "devil's battalion." They were a force of three thousand men, cavalry. They had trucks carrying kerosene and dynamite. They used hand pumps, pouring the kerosene through them to make the fires spread faster and more widely.





As we approached Izmir, we interrogated the Greek soldiers we had captured, and they all gave the same answer: Prince Andrea commanded the "devil's battalion." He had given the order to "burn everything." In fact, to set an example for his soldiers, he had personally set some of our villages on fire.





Prince Andrea was very cruel, even merciless towards his own soldiers. And... he was among those thrown into the sea from Izmir on September 9th. He returned to Greece with great shame. Because of the defeat they suffered, he was declared a "traitor" in his country. He was arrested. He was sentenced to death. Just as he was about to be executed by firing squad, England intervened, and through British diplomatic efforts, he was pardoned. He was exiled to France. He went to France humiliated, in the hold of a cargo ship, among crates of oranges.





Prince Andrea was the brother of the Greek king Constantine. Both his older brother and his father were Greek kings, and he himself was a Greek prince. But, they were all Danish! Yes, their father, who was placed on the Greek throne, was actually the son of the Danish king, made a puppet king of Greece by England. Prince Andrea's mother, Queen Olga, for example, was actually Russian, a Russian duchess, a member of the Romanov dynasty, and became the Greek queen when she married the Greek king.


So, in fact, there were no Greeks in the Greek royal family that ruled Greece and attacked Anatolia.





Anyway... This Prince Andrea narrowly escaped execution by firing squad, was pardoned thanks to England, and was exiled to France.





He was married to Princess Alice of the House of Windsor, a member of the British royal family. Princess Alice suffered from schizophrenia, and as her illness worsened during their exile, she was hospitalized in Switzerland. They didn't divorce, but they began living separately. Years later, after leaving the hospital, Princess Alice returned to Greece and became a nun! She wasn't even aware of her princess status anymore; she confined herself to the church and became a nun. Seeing that things weren't going well, she was brought to England by the British Royal Family, began living in Buckingham Palace, died there two years later, was initially buried in the gardens of Windsor Castle, her birthplace, but later her remains were exhumed and taken to Jerusalem, where she was buried in the gardens of the Russian Orthodox Monastery.


Yes... Prince Andrea, the commander of the "devil's battalion" that set Anatolia ablaze during the occupation, experienced such a tragedy in his family; his wife's life, which began as a princess, ended in madness.





Prince Andrea had five children, four daughters and one son. All four of his daughters married German aristocrats; all of their German husbands were Nazis, admirers of Hitler, members of the Nazi Party, and served in the Nazi army during World War II.





His wife was insane. Their daughters were Nazis. And what about his son?





Prince Andrew had only one son, Philip... He was born in Greece, and while they were living in exile in France, at the age of seven he was sent to England to live with his uncle for his education. When he was only nine, his mother was diagnosed with schizophrenia and confined to a clinic; he experienced this terrible trauma at such a young age. He was an intelligent child, graduated from the British Royal Naval College, became an officer, and participated in the Second World War as a battleship commander.





In 1944, his father, Prince Andrea, died penniless in Monte Carlo. The commander of the "devil's battalion" that set Anatolia ablaze, in a cautionary tale, died miserably, having lost everything. The curse of the Anatolian people he had burned alive had come true. Not only did he leave his son nothing, but he also left him with debts of 20,000 pounds sterling.





Immediately after the war, Philip met Princess Elizabeth, heir to the English throne. It was a turning point in his life. He was poor, but he was a nobleman, a military officer with a solid record, not raised as a Greek, but a true English gentleman. He was 25 years old when he proposed to the 20-year-old Princess. The Princess's father, the King of England, accepted, and they married in 1947.


Philip's sisters were alive, but they were not invited to the wedding because they were all married to Nazis, and all the German aristocratic grooms served in the Nazi army under Hitler.


Philip erased from his records his great-grandfather, who was King of Denmark, his grandfather and uncle, who were King of Greece, and his father, who was Prince of Greece, thus renouncing his Danish and Greek principalities and becoming an ordinary English citizen. He was born Orthodox, but he also renounced that and converted to Anglicanism, the official church of England. In return, the King of England made a gesture to his son-in-law, making Philip the Duke of Edinburgh.


Just one year later, their first child, the current King Charles, was born.


In 1950, their daughter Anne was born.


In 1952, the king died, and Princess Elizabeth ascended the throne, becoming Queen Elizabeth.


When Philip assumed the title of the Queen's husband, Andrea, who had perpetrated massacres of Turks in Anatolia, also became the father-in-law of the Queen of England.


Their third child, Andrew, was born in 1960.


The third child was named after Prince Andrea, the commander of the devil's battalion who set Anatolia ablaze and burned our people alive—that is, his grandfather.


Instead of saying "Andrea," they said "Andrew," which is the English spelling.





(Of course we will forgive, of course we will always look forward, we will never hold grudges about what happened in the past, every bad event happens and ends within its own context, we will never hold grudges, we will cleanse our diplomatic relations and our country's interests from the pains of the past. But... we will never forget. That's how it is, we will remember, we will do our duty as journalists and remind society, especially our young people, we will tell them, we will remind them.)





From Andrea to Andrew...


This is a cautionary cycle.





During the 1919 invasion, Prince Andrea, the commander of the "devil's battalion," who, with the backing of Britain, invaded Anatolia, wreaked havoc throughout Western Anatolia, from Izmir almost to Ankara, set our Aegean region ablaze, took pleasure in burning our cities and villages, and burned our people alive, had a grandson, Andrew, who shares his name... Just like his grandfather, he became a figurehead of grave crimes against humanity.





Like his grandfather, he was the king's grandson, like his grandfather, the king's brother, like his grandfather, he was a prince; his life, which began like a fairy tale, ends with a shameful end, just like his grandfather.





The grandson of the commander of the "devil's battalion" who poisoned the blood of the Anatolian people turned out to be one of the closest friends of the global psychopath Epstein.





His grandfather was a mass murderer, expelled from his country on charges of treason, and died in misery; his grandmother was insane; his aunts were Nazis; and he himself turned out to be a pedophile.


Like his grandfather, he was stripped of his titles of nobility, his military ranks, his medals, and his royal estates; he became the most hated man in England.





I think this is what they mean by "God's punishment is inescapable."


Those who tainted the blood of the Anatolian people, from grandfather to grandson, got what they deserved.





The curse of the Anatolian people, the curse of our blessed lands, the pure spirit of the National Forces, as pure as the heart of the Anatolian people, follows the commander of the devilish battalion like a curse.





From my point of view, the Epstein news, that's it." - Yılmaz Özdil https://sozcu.com.tr/epstein-p291509

19.02.2026

SERSERi

 

16.02.2026

#SâdeceHalk

 

#NurDasVolk

 



Un4tunately, I haven't created a video 4 the German version of #OnlyThePeople; instead, I've uploaded three German versionz here | Für die deutsche Version von #OnlyThePeople habe ich jetzt leider zwar kein Video erstellt; stattdessen habe ich hier drei deutsche Versionen hochgeladen | Maalesef #OnlyThePeople'ın Almanca versiyonu için bir video hazırlamadım; bunun yerine, buraya üç Almanca versiyonunu yükledim:

14.02.2026

CHARLIE CHAPLIN & PRINCE BAĞLANTISI - 2

A KING IN NEW YORK (1957) filmi de kezâ yine meğerse – ki hiç hatırlayamıyorum, ama sanırım çocukken Alman TV'sinde izlemiştim – Prince’in UNDER THE CHERRY MOON mâcerasına azıcık ilham olmuş olsa gerek:

A King in New York


UNDER THE CHERRY MOON (1986)

Under the Cherry Moon

Aşk hayatlarını Butler’larının nazik desteğiyle ele alıyor olmaları açısından yâni, en azından...

► A KING IN NEW YORK (1957) - izlemek için tıklayınız

(Korsan siteler için reklam engelleyici özellikli Brave tarayıcısını tercih etmeniz önerilir.)

about.me/krasnimeanzred

13.02.2026

11.02.2026

9.02.2026

IRMAK